Reflection from a healthcare professional

I recently met Bridget Taumoepeau, a lively and intesting woman who has worked as a psychiatrist for a long time. Bridget kindly shared this piece below. It is very good. Cheers. Richard

Te Taha Wairua – a neglected concept.

In the 1980’s, Professor Sir Mason Durie introduced us to the health model of Te Whare Tapa Wha, in the context of providing relevant assessment in mental health services for Maori.[1] This model has been widely accepted and used in many settings. I note, for example, that a study of smoking cessation in Maori also used Te Whare Tapa Wha[2].

While this model was developed for Maori Mental Health Services, it is also applicable to non-Maori services and to anyone interested in a holistic approach to health and wellbeing.  I know, for example, of Pakeha living in community, who use it as a measure of health of their community and environment[3]. In writing this, I am considering a wide range of settings that require assessment for the purpose of promoting health and healing.

For those unfamiliar with the model – in brief, it describes the principle that for a person (the house or whare) to be healthy, the four walls must be strong.  These ‘walls’ or corner stones are physical health (te taha tinana); mental health (te taha hinegaro); family (te taha whanau) and spiritual health (te taha wairua).

The Government organisation ‘Careers New Zealand’ has published a description of Te Whare Tapa Wha, describing the four aspects of health[4].  Te Taha Wairua is outlined as follows: “This refers to spiritual awareness. It is recognised as the essential requirement for health and wellbeing. It is believed that without spiritual awareness an individual can be lacking in well-being and therefore more prone to ill health. Wairua explores relationships with the environment, people and heritage.  Spiritual awareness is key to making effective career decisions.”[5]  There could hardly be a stronger statement as to the importance of spiritual health.

As with understanding any model of health, we should reflect on how this applies to us as practitioners. How would we ourselves measure up in terms of the four cornerstones of our own health? Do we, in our everyday lives, consider the importance of these four aspects of our lives to our own wellbeing? How often when we have become unwell, have we been told that we are not attending to our physical health, or to our mental health, or giving enough time to our families – a source of strength and support as well as sometimes an anxiety or responsibility?  How often, however, would we consider our spiritual health in making such a self-assessment? Not often, I would suggest. If we are unfamiliar with this aspect of our own wellbeing, how can we incorporate this into our assessment and understanding of others?

First of all, we have to know what spirituality means.  What is the spiritual aspect to our lives? This may vary markedly from person to person, but could be considered to include the idea of our world view; the beliefs or practices that sustain us; an awareness of a life force greater than or outside of ourselves; ways that we make sense of life; what gives meaning and purpose to our lives; spiritual or religious communities that we belong to; how do we feel connected and so on. Such spiritualty may or may not include a traditional religious belief system.

Aside from a possible lack of knowledge about spirituality, we seem to have a reluctance, a shyness, a lack of confidence about asking about this part of people’s lives. With an increasing secularisation of society, an ability to have a relaxed talk of God, a Higher Being or our world view seems to have sunk without trace.  And yet we hear of people who have taken up meditation, attend Buddhist retreats, follow a guru who inspires them, have developed rituals within their families for special occasions, such as the naming of a child, attaining adulthood, death etc. One problem may be that we often conflate spirituality with organised religion.  For those who do not practice the latter they may not recognise that they do have a spiritual aspect to their lives, whereas those who do practise may be reluctant to talk about this as society in general and, perhaps, psychiatry in particular have been dismissive of these beliefs and practices. In addition, saying that one meditates every morning is considered admirable, whereas talking about one’s prayer life and personal relationship with God may be looked upon askance.

As with all aspects of medicine, one’s own experiences may affect the way we practice our skill. Putting this in context, those of us with physical problems may be very sympathetic to a fellow sufferer, be knowledgeable about available services and form a good rapport with the patient.  On the other hand, if their difficulty is minor in contrast to one’s own, it is easy to belittle their distress.  Similarly if we have experienced any aspect of mental illness (and, after all, we are not exempt from the statistics of 1 in 4 or 1 in 5 being likely to have at least an episode of mental distress in our lifetime), this may make us better able to empathise with the person in front of us. But what of spirituality??

If Te Taha Wairua is considered ‘an essential requirement for health and well-being’, than we are being negligent if we ignore this aspect of people’s lives. Encouraging such a conversation may be an opportunity for people to realise the importance of spirituality; to recognise the spiritual side of their lives; to strengthen the way that they develop their beliefs which anchor them in life and link them to others. New Zealand would be one of the most secular societies, yet people are searching for meaning in their lives. Sometimes they don’t know where to look or what to say, yet may already have the answers within themselves, waiting for someone to help them discover this aspect of their lives.

Each doctor, health professional, counsellor, therapist develops their own style of engaging a patient and learning about their concerns and also their strengths.  Such inquiry needs to include getting in touch with the spirituality of the person in front of them.

And so to the practical ways to achieve this – making an inquiry into how much of this is taught in training programmes and what, if anything, needs to be improved; developing ways to ask about this subject, with which we may be unfamiliar – ways that do not upset or alienate people; learning from other professionals who may be more familiar with this area of assessment; committing ourselves to addressing this issue; modelling to younger practitioners that this is part of holistic care; seeking support within our professions from like-minded colleagues – in other words developing this skill as we would any other practical skill in order to treat and heal the best we can.

Bridget Taumoepeau M.B. Ch.B., FRANZCP, B. Theol.

[1] Durie, Mason. ‘Indigenizing mental health services: New Zealand experience’. Transcultural Psychiatry 48(1-2) 24-36.

[2] Glover, Marewa. ‘Analysing Smoking using Te Whare Tapa Wha’, New Zealand Journal of Psychology Vol 34, No.1, March 2005.

[3] Fr. Phil Cody sm, personal communication.


[5] Ibid.


Healthcare chaplaincy needs support

Kia ora koutou,

I’ve read a couple of papers recently that highlight the importance, usefulness, value and care that healthcare chaplaincy offers that no other healthcare profession can do. As I’ve noted on this site before, we underpay them, they are poorly resourced, and they could be much better integrated into our health systems, to the benefit of patients, whanau and staff. As one of these papers notes:

“Our findings suggest that: (1) Chaplains should attempt to work with all patients, even those who do not express strong religious or spiritual views in advance, (2) there is value to including chaplains as a full member of typical care team, and (3) there are observable and consistent characteristics of chaplains and their style of interaction with patients (and physicians) that contribute to their effectiveness.”

Continue reading

Spirituality & suicide?

Kia ora koutou,

For some time I’ve thought there is a relationship between spirituality and self-harm / suicide. However there is very little discussion, at least at in the public sphere, about this aspect of causes. Below is another study suggesting this relationship.



Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 26;80:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.08.004. [Epub ahead of print]

The influence of spirituality and religiousness on suicide risk and mental health of patients undergoing hemodialysis.



Despite the large amount of literature assessing how spiritual and religious beliefs have an impact on mental health and suicide risk in various groups of patients, few studies have investigated patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The purpose of this study is to investigate whether spirituality and religiousness (S/R) are associated with the presence of suicide risk as well as whether those beliefs are also associated with the presence of mental health problems in patients undergoing hemodialysis.


Cross-sectional study carried out in three Brazilian dialysis units involving hemodialysis patients. The study assessed religiousness (Duke Religion Index); spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp 12); mental health – depression and anxiety (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-MINI); and risk of suicide (MINI). For analysis, adjusted logistic regression models were applied.


A total of 264 (80.7%) patients were included, 17.8% presented suicide risk, 14.0% presented current major depressive episode, and 14.7% presented generalized anxiety disorder. Concerning spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp 12), the subscale of “Meaning” was associated with lower risk of suicide, depression, and anxiety. The subscale “Peace” was associated with lower depression and anxiety, whereas the subscale “Faith” was associated with lower suicide risk and depression. Religiousness measures were not associated with the study outcomes.


Spiritual beliefs were associated with lower suicide risk and better mental health among hemodialysis patients. Factors related to spiritual well-being, such as “meaning”, “peace” and “faith” were more associated with the outcomes studied than religious involvement. Further studies are needed to replicate our findings in different cultural and religious settings.

Good 2018 conference – abstracts due soon


to register for the Fifth International Conference of the British Association for the Study of Spirituality (BASS)

Thursday 17 May – Saturday 19 May 2018
Coventry University, Coventry, England, UK

In an exciting new collaboration, the 2018 BASS International Conference will be a joint venture with the European Conference on Religion, Spirituality and Health (ECRSH). This is in recognition of the academic interests that BASS shares with ECRSH. The conference will be designed in a spirit of international co-operation and collegiality in the field of the study of spirituality, which is an important part of our mission.

As the venue for the conference will be the city of Coventry, an internationally recognised centre for peace and reconciliation, this conference also offers an important opportunity for both organisations to explore the spirituality of forgiveness and reconciliation in the many contexts in which it is encountered. Thus, the main theme of the conference will be:

Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Health, Medicine and Social Sciences

Although keynote speakers from a variety of academic disciplines and professional backgrounds will provide a comprehensive overview of this topic, papers and workshops presented in concurrent sessions need not have an overt focus on forgiveness or reconciliation but must fit within the remit of BASS* or ECRSH.

You are warmly invited to participate in this biennial gathering of researchers, scholars and practitioners from many nations, and to submit abstracts for oral presentations, symposia or posters on related topics in your own academic or professional context.

Deadline for the submission of abstracts is 31 October 2017

Please note that registration and submission of abstracts is via the ECRSH website. It asks for abstracts in the traditional ‘scientific’ format of ‘background, aims, methods, results, conclusions’. If this is not appropriate for your academic discipline or professional context, please submit an abstract in your usual style. In all cases, write ‘BASS Abstract’ at the top.

Information about the acceptance of your abstract will be sent by the end of February 2018. You are encouraged to register now to take advantage of reduced rates. Registration can be cancelled in the event of non-acceptance of an abstract.

We very much look forward to meeting you.

To register for the 2018 conference, click here.

To submit your abstract until 31 Oct 2017, click here.

To visit the BASS website and read the Conference and Abstract invitation, click here.

Please circulate this invitation through your own networks and to anyone who might be interested.

If you wish to unsubscribe from the BASS conference mailing list, please send an e-mail to with the subject UNSUBSCRIBE and your e-mail address (eg. UNSUBSCRIBE:




* The purpose of BASS is to advance education for the public benefit in the subject of spirituality by promoting:

  1. a) the critical study of all aspects of spirituality;
  2. b) education and dissemination regarding these matters; and
  3. c) the development of inclusive and respectful policies and professional practices.


BASS is a Company Limited by Guarantee (Company No: 7549446)

and is on the Register of Charities (Registered Charity No: 1166990)

Spirituality / wairua and evaluation

Kia ora koutou,

I keep coming back to this excellent paper. One of the big challenges, after understanding spirituality, is putting into our work practice. This paper is one of few that help to explain how wairua can be included in evaluation. Here is the abstract and citation:

Wairua and Cultural Values in Evaluation

Wairua (spirituality) is threaded through cultural beliefs, practices and values of Māori (Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand). It is an inherent part of the daily life and cultural vitality that is embedded in Māori services and programmes. In a wānanga (forum for discussion and learning) Māori and Pasifika (peoples from the Pacific Islands, Polynesia, who reside in Aotearoa New Zealand) evaluators were asked to share their thoughts about how they acknowledge, value and represent wairua in their evaluation work. Seven principles emerged from this sharing: Mauri – the life force – feeling connected; Aroha ki te tangata – respect for people; Manaaki ki te tangata – generosity and sharing with people; Kaitiakitanga – guardianship; Kia tūpato – taking care; Whakanoa – cleansing of the spirit; and Mōhiotanga, mātauranga and māramatanga – knowledge collective wisdom and enlightenment (Kennedy, et al., 2015). In this paper Māori evaluators expand the discussion of the first three of these themes, using the dialogue of the wānanga to inform the further exploration of Aroha ki te tangata, Manaaki ki te tangata, and Mauri. The evaluators examine how rituals of encounter, and the building and maintaining of relationships strengthen the a wairua (spiritual) connections with evaluation participants that last beyond the life of any single evaluation; whilst engendering notions of care, respect and obligation. It is hoped that the exploration of these experiences will prompt other evaluators to contemplate how wairua is woven into their culturally responsive evaluation practice.

Kennedy, V., F. Cram, K. Paipa, K. Pipi and M. Baker (2015). “Wairua and cultural values in evaluation.” Evaluation Matters-He take tō te aromatawai 1: 83-111.

Question about spiritual flourishing

“What are the environments where spirituality is already flourishing?”

– religious, cultural/ethnic, alternative, communities, countries?

I ask this question as I’m looking into spirituality in public health – population health. And part of the answer must be about what is already happening.

Any and all comments welcome.